dukehealth.org linkdumc linkduke university link
January 27, 2003 Volume 12 No. 2



Gulf War Chemicals May Cause Sexual Dysfunction For Vets

A combination of chemicals given to protect Gulf War soldiers against deadly diseases and nerve gas may have inadvertently damaged their testes and sperm production, according to animal experiments at Duke University Medical Center.

The new study could explain why some veterans have experienced infertility, sexual dysfunction, and other genitourinary symptoms, said Mohamed Abou Donia, PhD, a Duke pharmacologist.

Three chemicals were given to soldiers to protect them against insect-borne diseases and nerve-gas poisoning: the insect repellent DEET, the insecticide permethrin, and the anti-nerve gas agent pyridostigmine bromide.

In a study designed to mimic those same conditions, Abou Donia and his colleagues gave rats equivalent doses to what the soldiers received. When given together, the chemicals caused extensive cell degeneration and cell death with various structures of the testes, they found. The damage was even more severe among rats that were exposed to moderately stressful situations in addition to the chemicals.

Results of the study, funded by the Department of Defense, are published in the January 10, 2003 issue of The Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health.

"It appears that moderate stress, combined with the three chemicals, caused the most severe deterioration in testicular structure and sperm production, and these conditions were likely experienced by some Gulf War soldiers in the combat environment," said Abou Donia, principal investigator of the study.

"Interestingly, the chemically-treated rats don't look or behave any differently than normal rats, just as the soldiers don't show any outward signs of disease," he said. "But under a microscope, you can see clear and well-defined damage to a variety of testicular structures."

"On every objective measure, the testes showed severe degeneration in the presence of multiple chemicals, suggesting that the chemicals have a synergistic or additive effect," said Abou Donia.

The testicular damage corresponds to equally devastating brain changes in the same rats exposed to the chemicals plus stress, he said. Findings from those experiments were published in the August 2002 issue of Neurobiology of Disease.

In that study, Abou Donia's team showed that chemicals and stress increased the permeability of the blood-brain barrier, allowing substances that would normally be blocked to enter the brain. Moreover, the researchers found large numbers of dead neurons, or nerve cells, in regions of the brain that control muscle strength and movement (cortex); balance and coordination (cerebellum); and memory, cognition and mood (hippocampus). Yet the animals appeared normal to the naked eye.

Similarly, Gulf War veterans have complained of deficits in these very functions for more than a decade, while clinical exams show no obvious signs of disease.

"The brain deficits we found in rats reside in specific areas of the brain that we can't measure in living humans," said Abou Donia. "This is why the deficits are so difficult to assess clinically and why animal studies are so critical to understanding the cellular damage."

"The military used these chemicals with the best of intentions, to protect soldiers from indigenous diseases in the Gulf War region," he said. "Without protection, there may have been thousands of deaths. But it appears that the precautions prevented one set of problems while creating another. Now, our task is to discern the mechanisms of illness in order to providethe soldiers with maximum protection and the least risk of chemically induced injury."

Duke colleagues Hagir B. Suliman, PhD, Wasiuddin A. Khan, PhD, and Ali A. Abdel-Rahman were co-authors of the paper.





| Home Page | About INSIDE | Contact Us |

| Current Issue |
| Feature Article |News |Patient Care |Research |People |News At a Glance |
| Previous Issues |

© Inside DUMC 2002-10: January 27, 2003 Volume 12 No. 2
Duke University Medical Center Office of Publications
Please send comments to EDITORINSIDE@mc.duke.edu